Gerard van Enk wrote: >> Maybe we need a new state (i.e. TEMPORARY) >> Btw what is the 'SYSTEM' state for ? >> > > I don't know, maybe fields only used inside the 'SYSTEM'? Fields that > don't need to be exposed outside the system?
Maybe 'SYSTEM' was ment for the field number, otype, and owner? If it is, shouldn't we use it? Maybe we can use 'SYSTEM' to designate a field that cannot be changed by a user? And what do people think - do we need more states? Maybe TEMPORARY (or HIDDEN)- for the transaction manager's temporary fields? -- Pierre van Rooden Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772815 "So long, and thanks for all the fish"
