Pierre van Rooden wrote: > Gerard van Enk wrote: > >>> Maybe we need a new state (i.e. TEMPORARY) >>> Btw what is the 'SYSTEM' state for ? >>> >> >> I don't know, maybe fields only used inside the 'SYSTEM'? Fields that >> don't need to be exposed outside the system? > > > Maybe 'SYSTEM' was ment for the field number, otype, and owner? > If it is, shouldn't we use it? Maybe we can use 'SYSTEM' to designate a > field that cannot be changed by a user? >
Sounds ok to me. > And what do people think - do we need more states? Maybe TEMPORARY (or > HIDDEN)- for the transaction manager's temporary fields? > Aren't these two different things? Maybe use hidden for user-definied hidden fields and temp for temporary fields? Fields that need to be calculated or something like that? Gerard
