Gerard van Enk wrote: >> And what do people think - do we need more states? Maybe TEMPORARY (or >> HIDDEN)- for the transaction manager's temporary fields? > > Aren't these two different things? Maybe use hidden for user-definied > hidden fields and temp for temporary fields? Fields that need to be > calculated or something like that?
That's what VIRTUAL field are for. User-defined hidden fields do not make sense (how can they be hidden if the user defines them?) I think of using the HIDDEN fields for fields that are needed by the system but that the user need not know about. -- Pierre van Rooden Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772815 "So long, and thanks for all the fish"
