>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Pierre van Rooden >Verzonden: donderdag 6 februari 2003 16:33 >Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Onderwerp: CALL: media package > > >Call for: >Determining a media package > >Description: >We need to determine package to place the data of the media project. >We like to grab the opportunity to decide on a package structure that >allows all future extensions to be included in the mmbase package >structure without causing confusion with (for isntance) core packages or >functionality. >We have the following sugegstions: > >- use the existing 'applications' package (wich currently includes >xmlimporter, editwizard, and dove): > >org.mmbase.applications.media > >- a new package for 'extensions' : > >org.mmbase.ext.media > >- a new main package name, moduled after java / javax: > >org.mmbasex.media > >Someone pointed out that the last idea might conflict with the >convention to use a domain name for the main package name. I don't think >that is a big issue, but others migth think differently. > >We ask you to give a vote for each package name: >+1 if you like the name, +0 if you are indifferent or don't like it >much, -1 if you have practical objections (as opposed to taste), and >VETO if you have serious show-stopping issues with it. > > >START OF CALL: Thursday 06 february 2003, 16:30 > >END OF CALL: Tuesday 11 february 2003, 16:30 > > >Package name: org.mmbase.applications.media > >[X] +1 (YEA) > >[_] +0 (ABSTAIN ) > >[_] -1 (NAY), because : > >[_] VETO, because: > > >Package name: org.mmbase.ext.media > >[_] +1 (YEA) > >[_] +0 (ABSTAIN ) > >[_] -1 (NAY), because : > >[_] VETO, because: > > >Package name: org.mmbasex.media > >[_] +1 (YEA) > >[_] +0 (ABSTAIN ) > >[_] -1 (NAY), because : > >[_] VETO, because: > >
Daniel.
