On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:46, Kees Jongenburger wrote: > On Wednesday 07 April 2004 12:11 pm, Remco van 't Veer wrote: > > > The reusability of this code outside an mmbase enviroment is another > > issue. I agree with you but I would like to take it one step further by > > also decoupling some existing features from mmbase like imgdb. This > > code can be useful for other projects where mmbase is not the right > > choice. > > You might want to "join" a project that aims at maintaining MMBase > supporting applications and modules. > "MMBase supporting" is the interesing part here. > http://mmapps.sourceforge.net/ > While not strictly an MMBase project it makes it possible to share > "MMBase supporting applications" ,you are more then welcome (even if > you are not a MMBase commiter)
This is not what I am trying to say. IMHO, mmbase should move more in the direction of a application server like enhydra. There all "technologies" (xmlc, barracuda, dods etc.) can be used separately.
