To be honest I would think that it would be more beneficial to mmbase to join forces with other community parties and collectively develop one tool that really rocks, in stead of having various tools that overlap and all miss functionality. Wouldn't you agree? ernst
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Rob van Maris > Verzonden: dinsdag 12 oktober 2004 15:54 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase question > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ernst Bunders > > > > I would be interested. Dous it allso produce a skeleton > > editing environment? I like that feature quite a lot (without > > knowing yet how usefull it turns out to be). Is your tool > > documented or downloadable somehwere? > > It does not produce an editing environment, that's not very > useful for us. Our tool is currently not publicly available. > It's integrated in our suite of build tools. > > Some extra work would be required to make it an external > tool, and Quantiq management has to approve. First I need to > know if there's demand. > > Rob van Maris > Technical Consultant > > Quantiq > xmedia & communication solutions > > Koninginneweg 11-13 > 1217 KP Hilversum > > T +31 (0)356257211 > M +31 (0)651444006 > E [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W http://www.quantiq.com > > >
