> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jaco de Groot > Verzonden: donderdag 14 oktober 2004 16:30 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: Optimization project, Step 3: Applications > > > Pierre van Rooden wrote: > > MMAPPTOOL: > > either move to 'MMAppTool' application, or remove > > Suggestion: remove > > I think this is still a usefull tool to read MMBase > applications and find out > what builders and relations are present.
What I am wondering about is this: wasn't the mmci project supposed to reach a phase where an admin interface would be implemented? If this would be done, the MMAPPTOOL would probably be redesigned. Allso, sinds the bridge is part of the core (correct?) this tool could allso be part of the core. Question: are the mmexamples en the mmeditors part of the core distribution? If so, I guess the above applies Ernst > > I think the communityprc module can be moved to. Michiel > stated on IRC that a > lot of example use this module. Maybe we can create an > examples application and > move it to this examples application? What is the use of the > communityprc module > anyway? How do the examples use it? Are people using this in > live situations? > > Jaco > > >
