> > Then let me rephrase my opionen: What every you plan to change regarding > > size types in Qt6... do it the standard (C++20?) way. > > We're doing it the way the committee says it should have done in the first > place, not the way it has done: signed.
If this plays well with the language and standard library features I am ok with it. It doesn't remove all the additional effort I mentioned but it will prevent the unnecessary interfacing/casting. As soon as user code is be rebased to ssize/C++20 and qsizetype everything is consistent which is the most important thing. And I suppose other libraries will follow the coming standard soon. BTW Are there plans/roadmaps regarding C++20 support? -- Best Regards, Bernhard _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
