On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 00:20, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 12:02:05 PST Ville Voutilainen wrote: > > A *very* big part of why span's size is being changed to unsigned is > > consistency, rather than the committee thinking > > that unsigned is necessarily the right kind of type. There's some > > ongoing work to alleviate the compatibility issues > > between signed and unsigned types, but that work will most likely not > > bear fruit in time for C++20. > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0907r4.html
Not even close, I'm talking about the future follow-up to http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p0946r0.html _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
