On 1/20/12 1:42 AM, "ext michael.godd...@nokia.com" <michael.godd...@nokia.com> wrote:
>Hi Laszlo, > >On 19/01/12 6:37 PM, "ext Laszlo Papp" <lp...@kde.org> wrote: > >>> Sorry about the delay - there has been no progress that I've seen. I >>> repinged again recently but will do again. >> >>Would it be the best to call instead ? > >Perhaps yes. I have received some initial guidance from Cristy - QtOpenAL >itself is unsuitable, but two other names were proposed as being more >acceptable: > >"Qt implementation of OpenAL" >"OpenAL for Qt" > > >The first isn't really accurate (perhaps "Qt wrapper for OpenAL"), but I'm >not sure how to translate the second into a git/module name :) openalforqt >perhaps, which doesn't really roll off the tongue. > >It's also important to be clear that this is a separate project from >OpenAL and that there is no implied endorsement of OpenALforQt by the >OpenAL copyright holders. > >Another alternative might be to reduce the explicit tie to OpenAL and make >a generic 3D audio API instead, with an OpenAL backend. Hoe about QtAudio3D then? Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development