> Hoe about QtAudio3D then? I am not familiar with Qt module naming conventions, but I think it is better than Qt3DAudio (ie. 3D would be more logical at the end of the module name) since:
a) It is less likely to confuse someone into thinking it has any relevance to Qt3. b) More consistent with the existing QtQuick3D module naming. c) This name has the capital letters more separated. =) So I agree with you. :) Michael ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development