Hello, On 20/01/12 11:53 PM, "ext Laszlo Papp" <lp...@kde.org> wrote:
>> Hoe about QtAudio3D then? > >I am not familiar with Qt module naming conventions, but I think it is >better than Qt3DAudio (ie. 3D would be more logical at the end of the >module name) since: > >a) It is less likely to confuse someone into thinking it has any >relevance to Qt3. >b) More consistent with the existing QtQuick3D module naming. >c) This name has the capital letters more separated. =) > >So I agree with you. :) Michael ? Sounds good to me. At some point (once it's not in playground) I think the new library could probably move to the qtmultimedia.git as a separate module in there, just to share some code. See also http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,13500 for a QML Audio 3D API we're also working on (there was also an earlier version last year that was based on the old qtmmk.git repo) - I think this should go with the QtAudio3D stuff for now because I'm not sure that it will be ready for the Qt5 feature freeze. Cheers, MichaelG _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
