On terça-feira, 17 de abril de 2012 07.41.26, jason.mcdon...@nokia.com wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan <gir...@forwardbias.in> wrote: > > > 1. qtestlib ends up exposing qpa api and thus testcases might end up > > > being binary incompatible - This should be fixed in > > > > AFAIK qtestlib doesn't promise binary compatibility (see e.g. > > http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtqa/commit/0a67286dcc3513880dbbb01a72596b1e087 > > 41fea/diffs) so I'm not sure if this actually needs fixing - but I'll > > leave that up to the folks working on testlib :) > > That's right, testlib isn't included in the BC promises (there's way too > much code in testlib that gets inlined via macros and no use of Qt-style > private classes), but should still maintain source-compatibility once 5.0.0 > is out.
And even though we don't promise it, we'd like to keep it for as long as
possible. It's very useful to swap out one Qt version for another and check
test results.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
