Hi Marius, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:03 AM, <marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com> wrote: > On 17/04/2012 03:34, ext Paul Olav Tvete wrote: >> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >>> As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with >>> a couple of helper scripts >> >> I just added the following "-1" comment on gerrit: >> >> I do not agree with this change. We have made a difference between >> public API and plugin API, and this is different from private >> implementation detail. >> >> The rest of the Lighthouse team are also skeptical. The main issue, >> as far as I can see, is documentation. This can be solved much in a >> much simpler way by using the \internal tag, as discussed earlier. >> There should also be a warning in the _qpa.h files, but it shouldn't >> be the "don't even think of using this file" warning from the _p.h >> file; these files are there for platform plugin authors to use. > > Also remember that yes, we don't promise BC from 5.0.0, but at some > point we would want the QPA api to stabilize at let it keep the same > promise as the rest of Qt, don't we? > > At which point, we would have to rename the files again?
This is how we have always done development in Qt. It starts out with _p.h and then becomes .h :) Girish _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
