On 23/04/14 09:34, "Olivier Goffart" <oliv...@woboq.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday 23 April 2014 00:28:46 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> Em qua 23 abr 2014, às 09:17:37, Olivier Goffart escreveu: >> > Just a little problem. >> > >> > +#if QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 3) >> > QSqlError( const QString& driverText = QString(), >> > const QString& databaseText = QString(), >> > ErrorType type = NoError, >> > int number = -1); >> > +#endif >> > + QSqlError(const QString &driverText, >> > + const QString &databaseText, >> > + ErrorType type, >> > + const QString &errorCode); >> > >> > First, the deprecated constructor is missing the QT_DEPRECATED >> > Second, the default arguments should go on the new constructor. >> >> Agreed on the first, can't do for the second. If you add the default >> arguments, the new constructor becomes ambiguous. > >I meant: ... instead of on the deprecated one. > >It is source compatible: New compiled code will use the new constructor, > old >compiled code will use the old one Agree with Olivier. The default arguments should be moved to the new constructor. Lars > >-- >Olivier > >Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com - http://code.woboq.org > >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >Development@qt-project.org >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
