On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Simon Hausmann <simon.hausm...@digia.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 22. April 2014 16.37.50 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> Em ter 22 abr 2014, às 14:12:46, Thiago Macieira escreveu: >> > http://macieira.org/~thiago/qt-5.3/QtQuick.diff >> >> Looks fine from the C++ side. I have no clue what those Q_REVISION changes >> do to QML. > > I don't think we need them actually, but they won't hurt :) >
I don't think there's any way to revision the added RESET signal. But since it's a bool, code that tried to assign undefined wouldn't have compiled before anyways. The Q_REVISIONs look like they're on new signals, in which case they are actually needed. But this means the changes look fine from the QML side :) . -- Alan Alpert _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
