On Monday 02 June 2014 13:24:55 Richard Moore wrote: > On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner <kreios4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann <simon.hausm...@digia.com> > > > > wrote: > >> I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the > >> class, > >> comparison of different software versions. > > > > QVersionInformation was also proposed as a name in the code review. I > > don't have a problem with changing the name other than it is really long > > for a simple class. > > How about QVersionComparator?
How about qVersionCompare(const QString&, const QString&)? Yes, that's a function. Is there really the need for a class to hold just a version string? And there could be an overload with a SuffixComparator. (or is qCompareVersion an even better name?) -- Olivier Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com - http://code.woboq.org _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development