On Thursday 10 July 2014 07:53:29 Keith Gardner wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Olivier Goffart <oliv...@woboq.com> wrote: > > On Monday 02 June 2014 13:24:55 Richard Moore wrote: > > > On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner <kreios4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > > > > I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the > > > > > class, comparison of different software versions. [...] > > > How about QVersionComparator? > > > > How about qVersionCompare(const QString&, const QString&)? > > Yes, that's a function. Is there really the need for a class to hold just > > a version string? > > > > And there could be an overload with a SuffixComparator. > > > > (or is qCompareVersion an even better name?)
> Currently, the QVersion::compare has an overload to pass a functor that > performs the suffix comparison. Are you suggesting having a "default" in > the operators that can be overwritten? I suggest not having any new classes. Just a function. (or a couple of functions) -- Olivier Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com - http://code.woboq.org _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
