On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Gerhard Scheikl <g.sche...@avibit.com> wrote:
> Hi > > Unfortunately, the QtXml classes contain a lot of bugs and are not really > maintained. > So we came up with the idea to replace the back-end with Xerces and try to > leave the Qt API part the same. > > Hi, pugixml has a benchmark with both Xerces and QtXml (and others) here: http://pugixml.org/benchmark.html It looks like Xerces is faster and it uses less memory than QtXml. Cheers, Cristian
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
