On November 20, 2016 20:39:08 Giuseppe D'Angelo <dange...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen > <oswald.buddenha...@qt.io> wrote: >> the repository has been created. > > I would also like to point out that, despite we have a repository, we > still don't have a tool for properly discussing the actual content of > QUIPs. > > * Gerrit does not work because comments cannot be threaded, they don't > stick to multiple reviews, and they can be ignored > * Email does not work (it may work for the overall direction, but not > for the in depth discussion) because a single message may cover > multiple discussion points, disrupting the threading, and discussion > points can get ignored (*) > > Any idea to how to actually make this work? Try reviewboard maybe? > > My 2 cents, > -- > Giuseppe D'Angelo > > > (*) This still happens all the time. User A proposes something; user B > replies with "I don't think it works in scenarios X, Y, Z"; user A > counter-replies "but Z is not a scenario we consider" and the > discussion derails about Z. Noone talks about X and Y, which instead > *must* be talked about, for the proposal to be accepted. We need > something that makes it impossible to ignore the comment about X and > Y. Do you think about a wiki where you can comment? I think you want something with the capability to describe, comment, argument and poll with a version history. Like you described email is a terrible tool for it. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development