>>Why not use most efficient compression formats instead, i.e. keep 7z and 
>>tar.xz only?
well, of course this would be possible as well but this would be a change to 
existing "behavior" : Currently 7z is with unix line endings.
And as you can see from statistic tar.gz and .zip are most used ones and so on 
it would be quite reasonable to continue offering those

br,
Jani

________________________________________
From: Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 12:46 PM
To: Jani Heikkinen; development@qt-project.org
Cc: releas...@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

15.02.2017, 13:39, "Jani Heikkinen" <jani.heikki...@qt.io>:
> Hi all,
>
> As you know we need to optimize our systems to be able to keep our plans in 
> the future. In CI side we are handling at least 4 different branches at same 
> time. Releasing side we should be able to do many releases/snapshots 
> parallel, test those releases/snapshots parallel etc. And all this needs lots 
> of hw capasity (both calculating power & disc space).
>
> We are trying to analyze the places where to do optimization and one place is 
> our src package creation and delivery: At the moment we are doing, testing & 
> delivering single src packages + separate submodule src packages, all these 
> with .zip, .7z, .tar.gz & .tar.xz! Huge amount of src 
> packages/snapshot/release. And currently doing these both for enterprise and 
> lgpl! In the future (5.10?) we should be able to use unified ones meaning no 
> separate LGPL & enterprise ones.
>
> But I think we could also drop those less used ones(*) as well with quicker 
> schedule so I propose:
>
> From 5.9 -> let's start doing & delivering
>
> - One set of src packages with ẃindows line endings (.zip, both single one & 
> submodule specific, both enterprise and lgpl)
> - One set of src packages with unix line endings (.tar.gz, both single one & 
> submodule specific, both enterprise and lgpl)

Why not use most efficient compression formats instead, i.e. keep 7z and tar.xz 
only?

>
> br,
> Jani
>
> *:Download statistic:
> .7z 7%
> .tar.gz 44%
> .tar.xz 12%
> .zip 37%
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

--
Regards,
Konstantin
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to