This can be not quite on this topic, but I have a suggestion and MVP implementation for QtIFW.
This may affect the development process, testing and create offline installers.
19:55, 15 February 2017 г., Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
19:55, 15 February 2017 г., Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
--Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017, às 15:05:06 PST, Dmitry Shachnev
escreveu:On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz) for
> the tarballs. (What you use as the Windows format is something you need to[cut]
+1, please leave tar.xz instead of tar.gz.
Users of all modern UNIX-like systems are able to decompress tar.xz, so .gz
has really no advantage over .xz.--
Adding my voice to that. If data volume is an issue, then let's by all means
standardise on .tar.xz.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Regards,
Konstantin Podsvirov
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
