Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017, às 15:05:06 PST, Dmitry Shachnev escreveu: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz) for > > the tarballs. (What you use as the Windows format is something you need to [cut] > +1, please leave tar.xz instead of tar.gz. > > Users of all modern UNIX-like systems are able to decompress tar.xz, so .gz > has really no advantage over .xz.
Adding my voice to that. If data volume is an issue, then let's by all means standardise on .tar.xz. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
