Den lör 27 okt. 2018 kl 15:06 skrev Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at>: > > Elvis Stansvik wrote: > > Den lör 27 okt. 2018 kl 13:37 skrev Olivier Goffart <oliv...@woboq.com>: > >> Jokes aside, I think we still should let users use Q_FOREACH for > >> implicitly shared containers. > > > > Yes, I thought that Q_FOREACH was slated for deprecation though. But > > maybe that's not set in stone yet? > > That's his point, it should be undeprecated.
Ah, now I see. I finally managed to read all the comments on that post, and I definitely don't want to open that can of worms here again. I'm fine with Guiseppes answers to my initial question, a qMoveToConst probably wasn't a good idea in the first place. Elvis > > Kevin Kofler > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
