> Den lör 27 okt. 2018 kl 13:37 skrev Olivier Goffart <oliv...@woboq.com>: > > Jokes aside, I think we still should let users use Q_FOREACH for implicitly > > shared containers.
But what's the percentage of Qt developers that understand the subtleties between Q_FOREACH and range-for ? Having a toolbox with two similar-but-not-quite constructs is bad for less seasoned users. I prefer explicitly assigning the container to a const local variable instead of relying in the magic behind macros. On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 1:53 PM Elvis Stansvik <elvst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I thought that Q_FOREACH was slated for deprecation though. But > maybe that's not set in stone yet? It is, see Qt's documentation: "Since Qt 5.7, the use of this macro is discouraged. It will be removed in a future version of Qt" Regards, Sérgio _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
