On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 12:24 Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 05:00, Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > - Any track record that Qbs was not fit for the job? (Please no "we > > > can't build Qt with it", as you cannot build Qt with anything but > > > qmake right now) > > > > No, of course one could have made it support building Qt. There were > some missing items like the configuration system and some other things, all > of those could of course have been implemented. > > How CMake will solve the 'configuration' problem. Will CMake allow us > to build for, say, QNX, GreenHill, VxWorks, and the likes? I doubt! > Everyone is bragging about open source (me first), but the Qt market > is medical, automotive and avionics/space industry, isn't it? How will > CMake cope with that? > CMake is not even aware that they are other OS behind WIndows and > Linux Desktop.... > CMake is used in Automotive. Here is a link to the blog of one of the QNX's Eclipse CDT contributors, and there you can see how hard it is to write a CMake toolchain file for QNX: https://cdtdoug.ca/2017/10/06/qnx-cmake-toolchain-file.html Cheers, Cristian. >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development