On 16/12/2018 12.00, Denis Shienkov wrote: > As we all can see, the CMake loses even QBS. We need to spent a tens of > hours/days to find out the solution, using CMake's , but with QBS same > issue solves for 30 mins or work immediatelly. Its very funny.
Really? Because *I* don't see that. This still sounds like FUD. Please show a concrete example (preferably one that doesn't involve Qt specific stuff, because that's not an entirely fair comparison) of a problem which a user who is *equally skilled* (or unskilled) with either tool can solve easily with QBS but cannot solve easily with CMake. -- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
