> preferably one that doesn't involve Qt specific stuff
A main point is that we discuss about using the CMake as an 'advanced'
buld system in context of Qt.
> Please show a concrete example
I already provided that example - it is cross-compilation. You can try
to cross-compile a simple application using CMake && Creator for the
Yocto target.
I'm, as a developer want to see a perfect integration between Qt stuff
&& CMake, because they (Qt managers) decided to choose the CMake. But
I'm don't see that it work at all. So, why I need to believe them? How
much time I need to wait until it will be fixed? Why I need to spent my
time at attempt to fix it (to lookup in CMake's magic macroses, tricks,
to rake its ugly syntax and so on)? I' don't think that CMake is a right
choose for a Qt developers.
Maybe, if in my case I never faced with my issue, I would be not so
negative (maybe even I would be closed my eyes to ugly CMake syntax and
so on).
Another issue it is that I need force to lookup a some CMake toolchains
in different github projects from custom peoples (e.g. for
Android/iOS/Keil/IAR toolchains). I mean, that it is not official
CMake's stuff (I know, that IAR toolchain already has ben added to
CMake, but I not sure that it will work too). Why I need to use for this
custom stuff? I'm even not sure that it will work.
Of course, I can write a own stuff (toolchain file or something else) on
CMake, but it is soo ugly. In my case I just will take QBS and do al
what I need in 100 times fastest and shorter and clearer and will not
worry at all (what and I do).
If Qt maintainers says that they will not remove the QtCreator && QBS
integration in future (I'm about QBS project manager plugin), then I
will not worry (don't care) about CMake. I will use QBS in any case.
I tried both CMake && QBS and I can say that for me QBS is a best
option. I'm not an expert, I'm just a user (consumer) of Qt && QtCreator
product.
Denis
18.12.2018 21:42, Matthew Woehlke пишет:
On 16/12/2018 12.00, Denis Shienkov wrote:
As we all can see, the CMake loses even QBS. We need to spent a tens of
hours/days to find out the solution, using CMake's , but with QBS same
issue solves for 30 mins or work immediatelly. Its very funny.
Really? Because *I* don't see that.
This still sounds like FUD. Please show a concrete example (preferably
one that doesn't involve Qt specific stuff, because that's not an
entirely fair comparison) of a problem which a user who is *equally
skilled* (or unskilled) with either tool can solve easily with QBS but
cannot solve easily with CMake.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
