On 15.1.2019 14.32, Lars Knoll wrote: >> On 15 Jan 2019, at 13:18, Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.ves...@qt.io >> <mailto:tor.arne.ves...@qt.io>> wrote: >>> On 15 Jan 2019, at 13:14, Allan Jensen <allan.jen...@qt.io >>> <mailto:allan.jen...@qt.io>> wrote: >>> >>> On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 12:22:11 CET Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: >>>>> On 15 Jan 2019, at 12:13, Allan Jensen <allan.jen...@qt.io >>>>> <mailto:allan.jen...@qt.io>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 12:06:17 CET Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:54, Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io >>>>>>> <mailto:lars.kn...@qt.io>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, guess I misunderstood a bit. My idea was to keep ‘dev’ for 5.x >>>>>>> development and ‘qt6’ for Qt 6 related development. At some point (when >>>>>>> 5.15 is branched) we’d basically rename qt6 to dev (because at that >>>>>>> point >>>>>>> there’s no 5.x anymore). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Okey, so we _will_ have parallel Qt 5 and Qt 6 feature development, and >>>>>> in >>>>>> that case need two “dev” branches. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I argue that instead of naming them ‘dev’ and ‘qt6’ like proposed, we >>>>>> use >>>>>> explicit names, either: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> - 6.0 and 5.15 (if there’s no 6.1 branched 6.0 is “dev. If there’s no >>>>>> 5.16 >>>>>> branched, 5.15 is “dev”) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I prefer the idea of keeping dev and make it head of 5.x that very clearly >>>>> >>> indicates we want new feature development in 5.x not in qt6. >>>> >>>> >>>> At some point we _do_ want new feature development in Qt 6 (I presume). The >>>> names we choose now will stick, let’s be a bit proactive. >>> >>> At that point qt6 will become dev, and later 6.0 and dev? >> >> No, because Qt 5 will still have overlapping “dev” work according to Lars, >> so >> we can’t rename it to ‘dev’. > > We can (and should) rename it to dev once the last 5.x version (presumably > 5.15) > reaches feature freeze (ie. in a year from now).
An alternative way of seeing (and perhaps handling) is in the same way as we handle feature branches. The qt6/6/next/whatever branch would be for development that can't be put into dev yet as it is not suitable for the 5.x releases. Everything that is suitable for 5.x would still go to dev. Once the last minor version of the 5 series of releases freezes, dev is open for 6.x stuff. Then the qt6/6/next branch would be merged into dev and deleted. -- Kari _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
