> On 15 Jan 2019, at 12:13, Allan Jensen <allan.jen...@qt.io> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 12:06:17 CET Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: >>> On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:54, Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io> wrote: >>> >>> Ok, guess I misunderstood a bit. My idea was to keep ‘dev’ for 5.x >>> development and ‘qt6’ for Qt 6 related development. At some point (when >>> 5.15 is branched) we’d basically rename qt6 to dev (because at that point >>> there’s no 5.x anymore). >> >> Okey, so we _will_ have parallel Qt 5 and Qt 6 feature development, and in >> that case need two “dev” branches. > >> I argue that instead of naming them ‘dev’ and ‘qt6’ like proposed, we use >> explicit names, either: > >> - 6.0 and 5.15 (if there’s no 6.1 branched 6.0 is “dev. If there’s no 5.16 >> branched, 5.15 is “dev”) > > I prefer the idea of keeping dev and make it head of 5.x that very clearly > indicates we want new feature development in 5.x not in qt6.
At some point we _do_ want new feature development in Qt 6 (I presume). The names we choose now will stick, let’s be a bit proactive. Tor Arne _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
