On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 14:36:12 +0200 André Pönitz <apoen...@t-online.de> wrote:
> So it might make even sense to step back further and start with > asking "What should Qt be?" before trying to find out on whether > a specific API is poorly designed or not, as that decision depends > on the purpose. I second a recent quote from Lars Knoll : > Qt has always had a somewhat different philosophy. Make C++ easy to use, > no need to use Java. The fact is that 95% of the source code our users >write will not be performance critical. You dont want to make the pay >the price of having a difficult to use API for those 95% of the code. And I wish to add: the vast majority of Qt developers I have met, are not C++ wizards. Philippe _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
