On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 14:36:12 +0200 André Pönitz <apoen...@t-online.de> wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:24:13PM +0000, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > The overall goal here is to make sure that we don’t have to carry > > poorly designed architecture or APIs around with us throughout the Qt > > 6 series, and as long as we care about binary and source compatibility > > within a major series, doing what we can for Qt 6.0 (and doing it > > right) is the only option we have. > > The problem is that we as a whole do not agree what "poorly designed > architecture or APIs" means in detail anymore, sometimes even on a very > fundamental level. > > E.g. the previous consent on Qt providing consistency and convenience > is challenged regularly by some. I don't think there is an actual controversy there; the term "some" already seems to be an overstatement. Christian _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development