Hi,
> Returning to your original post:
> >>> All the major frameworks out there (i.e. Java, C#) they have a
> >>> single String which does all the magic.
>
> Yes, and those systems are all built with the assumption that client
> code doesn't care if every single time anything happens to a string a
> fresh copy of it is made. They probably aren't actually that
> inefficient, but the basic premise of the design of those easy-to-use
> string classes is that if they were it wouldn't matter much.
>
When I say framework, I actually mean the framework code not the client code.
Let's take the java classes from Android, can you please show me a single
place where Android folk are using some strange: String myString =
StringLiteral("string") instead of a simple String myString = "string"; ?
> We don't have that luxury, sad to say,
>
But we have the luxury to loose potential Qt contributors because we are going
to force them to use so many string wrappers?
Cheers,
BogDan.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
