> On 21 Aug 2019, at 18:32, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development > <development@qt-project.org> wrote: > > On 21/08/2019 18:21, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: >> I would not want to have those “you’re using a fast, but not optimal version >> of the N string classes” warnings unless I was writing string heavy and >> performance sensitive code. > > So just use QString :-)
You mean foo[QString(“bar”)] = QString(“baz”)? That’s already two QStrings too much 😉 > >> And if we can have the compiler automatically make the right choice for us >> we wouldn’t need any of those. > > That's another "time machine" kind of thing. Is it? For Qt 6? > > Cheers, > -- > Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer > KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company > Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com > KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
