On Thursday, 23 April 2020 01:41:54 PDT Laszlo Agocs wrote: > -1 for QList. Why reuse and prioritize a name that has been tainted by > plenty of past discussions and comes with a lot of past baggage? Any Google > etc. search will bring up plenty of "QList-bad QVector-good" materials for > years to come, potentially leading to lots of Qt 5 vs Qt 6 confusion. Also, > Qt 5.x is not going to disappear overnight.
The other problem with QList is that std::list is a linked list, whereas QList/QVector is an array, like std::vector. I'd like to keep QVector so people know what it is. I don't mind keeping both names, actually and I do not propose a change from QStringList. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development