Im going to go ahead and echo Bertrand's comments regarding the intent of the actual committers. If we can get the process which produces the data to be more transparent and in the open, that would be a good first step for this project.
________________________________ From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 7:10 AM Subject: Re: OpenDDR - Cumulative IC, so it was "donated" by Eberhard who I haven't heard of any affiliation with the OpenDDR team so far Reza at least via issue tracker, etc. contributes to OpenDDR and he is also a member of the "team", but not so different from many Git-based projects (e.g. that Portlet 3.0 spec I mentioned uses GitHub that way) changes are merged by a single or small number of owners based on Pull-requests many people might raise. As of now, Reza could do that. If ownership and licensing is clarified there are a few others, including Stefano or myself (if I'm done scanning or faxing that signed document) Werner On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Bertrand/All, > >I understand the issue and have removed the cumulative resources which >I, it would appear, 'illegally' committed. > >This still leaves us with a bit of a resources issue. >I agree with Werner : it would appear Stefano is best placed to help >address some of these issues. > >esjr >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) >Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > >iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSBMUkAAoJEOxywXcFLKYccsgH/j92k0xwGuhioKu/QHIleiKa >yRIss84v1FE1e1MxUIVeRYI3ml8GuTB15xNV0IDp+m+SKK6jWRBdLqw5v5wsQxxN >911Ekp8jgs6yScHnlpyqFAixfaHJGxir331ovGaGlwaYklU9ly/ox/zCWuRqB7YP >9V0YzsTjz4MbHlNeDjxGZ1KAaB2Z3JTuZ92a6rP7wIjLgnUYFnmA+LTYa5eWmCr0 >v+rfvqEy0ld8rIuM98To5MHrNcpWvLWokb1/hQMco83JDNsxArfGJPk+HY4W6kHq >ixI7IBwkmjNJkYTGn3fKbqq3qbfPLN93sOe2Ks+rq7X7hiBjYkVJDc+3RyRshUQ= >=b6H3 >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
