P.s.: There must also be a tag under http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/devicemap/tags/ Equivalent to "java" where the Java client(s) get tagged, you likely have a "csharp" and "vbnet" folder and subfolder "1.0.0" (or whatever your preferred version is) containing each .NET module you wish to release.
I noticed, Radu put one in the highly disturbing (and totally inconsistent[?]) place http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/devicemap/trunk/browsermap/tags/browsermap-1.4.1-rc1/ So unless BrowserMap can resolve that (tempted to revoke my +1 for it) I find it extremely useful to collect official release tags (in SVN that's just a second pointer, it normally won't waste much space, especially for source files) as Bertrand suggested http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/devicemap/tags/releases/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/devicemap/tags/> What about that? Werner On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:07 AM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ok, colour me confused... > > Sorry about that, let's clarifiy! > > > what was : > > http://ducis.net/static/docs/dotnet/rel.html > > and, since gone : > > http://www.rezsoft.org/devicemap/ > > about ?... > > Well, for the first one you should know ;-) > > The process for a release is that > > 1) The project designates a release manager (RM). For the .Net stuff > you're the obvious victim. > > 2) The RM prepares the release archives, with signatures, digests etc. > > 3) The RM puts the release archives in a public place for review. > Ideally on ASF hardware, so my preferred location would be > http://people.apache.org/~esjr in your case, but I think > http://ducis.net/static is also acceptable > > It's much better to have just the files that you are about to release > at that location, so having the Java stuff as well at > http://ducis.net/static/docs/dotnet/rel.html is not good > > 4) For an initial podling release it's best to ask the podling > community (this list) to review the prepared release at this point, to > avoid too much back and forth when voting > > 5) once that's ok, start a [VOTE] thread here like Reza just did > > 6) once that vote passes, for a podling, have the Incubator PMC vote on it > > 7) release! In our case this means moving the artifacts that have been > voted on under http://apache.org/dist/incubator/devicemap > > Before step 7), nothing is considered released as far as the ASF is > concerned. The votes are required to make the releases an act of the > foundation, as opposed to individuals releasing stuff. > > Hope this helps, > -Bertrand >
