-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

FYI, as noted before, the .Net version will follow whatever version
numbering we agree on, internally they will have an 'extra'
build-number to work with the .Net Strong-Named Assemblies.
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/wd40t7ad(v=vs.110).aspx)

To my knowledge all [at the very least public] classes, methods etc
have identical names across the versions [java/.Net]. In some cases
the casing of the names may differ since the .Net version [I insist]
should be ISO/IEC 23271:2006
(http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=42927) compliant.

Apart from the loaders, where each goes for the patterns and strengths
common to their respective frameworks, everything else is a line by
line 'match'.

esjr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTx6QQAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcszMH/3uhYzxd6xPOgrHDwOt7UK2J
xjB80NVJp3BraPhEfPwRVfMMZi145Ni1GD5Tb54mcHjYHxAHTGjFODWINdf8oZRN
Zx6YdMiSOAGWWmy/2Jwg0yREgNmhyAbS/5NZ30/+whl9vfHW1Hb20nFvHpRmesJG
9vEs4ZgJWeojVgjNks//zcdUFZCFZQUzLZ8LLCPdrKhmgQqIA4LXehKOd5b+n93w
g7+rPYQbEFaJRv/eElF9oo99W0Y4jfdJ+J7f40HR2gVSLWscBdrnYTeMCbAFmp4t
zJdP1s8K/ldt91wmmcSYbTYBhXrcu46ciLjpxTReVcQSKeFUgo0sFJ5HT4v0Eq4=
=1Cxb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to