+1

As mentioned, if automated user-defined entries are added in future, there
could be an algorithm deriving a new ID (ensuring it doesn't already exist
in the DB) but for those entries already existing we should not overwrite
the (usually) human-readable Id with another one.

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Reza <[email protected]>
wrote:

> So I think you are talking about a GUID here...
>
> So is a GUID an attribute of a device? So a device has screen dimensions,
> CPU and hardware specs, pixels, a manufacture, etc. These are device
> attributes.
>
> Is a GUID a device attribute... No. A GUID is DDR metadata. We already
> have a metadata ID field, its called 'id'. Its human readable, it links
> devices with their patterns and it works pretty well. If you want to add a
> second metadata ID value, where do you store it? In the device attributes?
> In the browser attributes? In the OS attributes? Do devices, browsers, and
> operating systems need GUIDs and regular IDs? Or are we only assigning
> GUIDs to devices? When do we use the ID and when do we use the GUID? When
> (and why) would a client actually use a GUID instead of the ID? How and who
> generates the GUID?
>
> I think its best to just have 1 ID. The last thing I want is for people to
> start associating devices, browser, and operating systems by these GUIDs.
> IDs work fine here.
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]>
> To: "'[email protected]'" <
> [email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Data 2.0 - Vocabulary Properties : ddr_ and guid
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> So, no one sees the sanity of having an identifier that 'travels' well
> [think http, think XML, think json...encoding] besides a
> human-readable pseudo-identifier [common practice] ?
> Despite the fact that the DeviceMap [OpenDDR] data itself already
> clearly shows signs of having bitten by that 'bug' [barnes & noble vs.
> barnes and noble] in *non*-key data...
>
> I am baffled.
>
> esjr
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT+4skAAoJEOxywXcFLKYc3ykH/0oXmlmrvh0nTGUgjUH8R9nh
> UHGVsuHDiU0DG2J9aoFW0a3WvJUKfeQWuKO4zaHzkegD1fbtBgOTYTX//kNa74RJ
> yMhyU2yc75ZnPUjUd7t3/wZwW1as74wTgDftOA72j+EyXR1dyZwssEw1K4kRnXI8
> F/QJqe4QaR7dxvp5x2SpkuDJ4R9Ypohz5dNcNuI4ImkGtBQYlIe0K0JIMbBvpWq4
> 7dxYs+dBzM5F2ZM4hA2oGTGTg+/JsNP0vB8TWd5gxTwFzvz7kE3jip49qiRRVJlw
> ZSYW6KqmXEiqMNgmWkHvxo0BZceknwNZjrKtgdIOAoea0/2LJ4+eKcKPZn9vM7g=
> =muRs
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Reply via email to