Spaces are a concern, but everything currently works with them in place. Infact, everything currently works as things stand right now. If we decide to remove spaces and non alphanumeric characters from the id attribute in 2.0, great, I think that would be a considered a valid and needed clean up. Swinging to the extreme of using a GUID for the id, no, I do not think that is necessary.
________________________________ From: eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 6:42 PM Subject: Re: Data 2.0 - Vocabulary Properties : ddr_ and guid -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Simple spaces already give rise to 'changes' in the Id. Address DMAP-84 [which you opened *after* I raised the issue and it dawned on you...] and that fixes it for now, for you... I'm done 'debating' these obvious issues for no obvious reason. Waste of time. esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT+7vGAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcNNcIAKYWbYg7XcqKLzgYiapE8hS6 1n2e1t9v2WGs+ZkRgQcmuUoZIwNmXHHbhaMw3wOYKzOTiv4SORtr5czOMPMq9yyO ZUclCe5BVGwBWS8ZkR68bYO1f09kKJg9+YwdjIastfrQ4jrWgoLEQuHJvEI6NOFb DCtBK+nuV670ookK50526bnqqs600bpXIjAL6YKol8SKFa7LzB59L7fuPqblODfD gmqt4woFZxm3WsGemmzEK6cJzmtuPvhR63Aeq4N8VncD8ZbGK3kmJ4tWxD7Zioqo qCEz9ROp8Ye99VwOTrhlUzzkfP1FReEmISkoDGTzQ/ew0eMW8bzcm0ptv2NriCM= =pBPa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
