>> the chip architecture (like ARM) seems to be part of some UA strings now
Nice, we can leverage that in 2.0. ________________________________ From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Reza <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 4:11 PM Subject: Re: Device data 1.0.1: 18 new devices As seen on below list, there is no "unique" UA string it seems but see http://developer.nokia.com/devices/device-specifications/nokia-lumia-635 (Expand All) this Nokia Developer reference quotes a (hopefully representative) example UA: "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows Phone 8.1; ARM; Trident/7.0; Touch; rv:11.0; IEMobile/11.0; NOKIA; Lumia 635) like Gecko" P.s.: As asked by an attendee of a recent conference, the chip architecture (like ARM) seems to be part of some UA strings now, too. HTH, Werner On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: There was this place listing all sorts of User Agents and from my understanding the UA is not property of any such portal, so retrieving one of the User Agents seems OK: >https://www.handsetdetection.com/properties/vendormodel/Nokia > > >However,the Lumia 635 seems unkown also to that site. > > >Almost scary to know, a phone like the Nokia N70 alone >(https://www.handsetdetection.com/properties/vendormodel/Nokia/N70) seems to >have 2119 uniquely distinct UA signatures all refering to the same device >So the Nokia 100 only lists 1 unique UA, while many other devices have up to >4000 unique UA signatures it seems. > > >Must be harvested via an automated sytem, it is hard to believe manual entry >copes with Hundred Thousands unique UA strings... > > >This site has some sort of UUID (for the myriads of strings) but unlike the >actual UA string ("Nokia100/2.0 (2.0423.0_rc02) SymbianOS/7.0s Series60/2.1 >Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0" for Nokia 100) it should be assumed >unique to the site and must not be used. > > >Werner > > > > >On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote: > >So I have 18 devices ready for 1.0.1. Still need user-agents for 16 of them :) >I think I could come up with patterns, but if we can get user-agents as they >show in the wild, that would be best and the most accurate. >> >>Here are the devices: >> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-67?jql=project%20%3D%20DMAP%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20%22Device%20data%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22In%20Progress%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> >> >>Also, when I search google for: >> >>"lumia 635 user agent" >> >>DMAP-76 on apache JIRA is in the top 5 results for me. So thats really good! >>Problem is that the user-agent is blank for this JIRA... Im sure other >>developers are googling for user-agents, so if DeviceMap is in the top >>results, thats going to be good publicity for the project. Sooner or later, >>we may be the device classification authority (according to google rankings). >> >
