On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Darrell May wrote: > > Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > By issuing a new RPM with a different name you essentially create a > > project fork. I'm sure that that is not your intention. > > Actually IIRC this rpm's functionality has moved into Mitel's commercial > ServiceLink product. As such, I thought a project fork to keep this GPL > code alive was necessary. In any event I've Cc'd Jason and he can let me > know what he wants to do with my contrib.
I'll give it a whirl as soon as I get a chance. A quick glance at the diff between src files looks fine to me. Glad to see people are still using that rpm. Its actually not a part of the commerical product. There was talk about putting it into the GPL'd version of 5.0 at one point but there were some complications that needed working out first. Now that you've got me thinking about it again, perhaps I'll open it up and make those improvements. Thanks, Jay -- Jason D. Miller E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Software Developer Phone: +1 613.368.4387 Network Server Solutions Group Fax: +1 613.564.7739 Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.e-smith.com "Are those workers dead?" "Technically, yes ... but that's no excuse!", <cracks the whip>, "Back to work you lazy corpse! ..." --- Taken from DilbertTV, "Elbonian Trip" -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
