Isn't the reason RH packages samba in three packages the same reason for splitting up telnet, etc? If the computer is intended as a client there's no reason for a telnet server. Samba packaging is a little more of a grey area since the client could share files. Perhaps it's just easier to maintain security for RH, who knows.
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:28:12 -0500 Dan York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Greg, | | > I've always wondered why the Samba team packages Samba into one RPM when | > Red Hat comes out of the box as three RPMs. Well, here's why they do it: | | Thanks for posting this info. I, too, have always wondered why | RH did it differently from the Samba team. | | Thanks, | Dan | | -- | Dan York, Product Line Manager, SME Server and ServiceLink | Mitel Networks Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ph: +1-613-751-4401 Cell: +1-613-263-4312 Fax: +1-613-564-7739 | 150 Metcalfe Street, Suite 1500, Ottawa,ON K2P 1P1 Canada | http://www.mitel.com/sme/ and http://www.e-smith.com/ ________________________________ adam http://pbase.com/mrbass ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
