----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordon Rowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nick Warr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:34 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Nick Warr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > Sounds interesting, I really just need a way to have a copy of every > > outgoing mail sent archived for review. If Charlie's contrib does that, I'll > > give it a look. > > Yes, it will do that. Much cleaner than patching qmail, and freely > distributable. > Alright, you've convinced me, I'll give it a go :) > > [...] > > Still fails with the same %prep errors though, and the exact same code is > > there in the .spec file. I see your entry mentioning the removal, but it > > doesn't actually seem to have been removed. Or maybe I'm just dumb (another > > completely valid conclusion). > > No, I was just wrong :-) We did remove it from %pre/%post/%postun, > but did not remove it from %prep section, which was an oversight. Since > our build servers run qmail and already have these users/groups, it's > a no-op for us. I thought that might have been the case. > > > [...] > > I did, the .spec file even mentions the removal, it just doesn't seem to > > have been done. Can I comment it out without hosing the whole thing? > > Commenting out the entire %prep section should be fine. But, I'd > still recommend using the updated smtpfront-qmail instead. If smtpfront doesn't cut it, I may end up doing this.. thanks for the information. Nick -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
