begin thelema quotation of Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:56:33PM -0500:
> Lesser ability to deny is not really a problem. If someone's
> downloading illegal files off freenet, the cops are going to find the
> illegal data in their filesystem in one piece, not in a bunch of pieces
> in their encrypted freenet cache.
Not necessarily -- what if the person just happens to be reading Pigdog
Journal someplace where Pigdog Journal is illegal. It's easily possible
for all the HTML and images to be in the node's datastore but not in the
browser cache.
As Peter Todd pointed out, web sites in Freenet have the same
"deniability" problem as split files. Freenet chess, Freenet chat,
and other applications will have the same problem too. If you want
deniability, I think you pretty much have to take Peter's suggestion and
don't cache anything requested by a local client -- don't just blame
split files.
--
Don Marti "I've never sent or received a GIF in my life."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bruce Schneier, Secrets and Lies, p. 246.
http://zgp.org/~dmarti/ (Free the Web: http://burnallgifs.org/)
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
