On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:29:41PM -0000, David Childers wrote:
> 
> >Yes, but weakening the system for people who don't care at the expense of 
> >those that do is never an option.
> 
> The means of security is * not * knowing where the data is stored, in 
> addition to the requester of the information being masked.
> 
> If you analyze traffic flow through enough nodes at various points,
> you have a reasonably good map of the network. ( Port scanners and
> sniffers are a dime a dozen for any operating system. )
> 
> * IF * input or retrival of information through freenet is a security hazard 
> - then what is the purpose of freenet again ?

Pardon me, but what was your argument again?  From what I read you said
that you wanted extra functionality (live streaming) at the expense of
Freenets anonymity protections.

PGP signature

Reply via email to