> > is the best I can come up with. > > Overall, the problem is that there are NO things that humans can do > that machines can't do, computationally, at the theoretical level. Thats complete bullshit. There are plenty of things that humans can do that computers can't at the moment, and unlike other fields, it suffices to play catch up, that is, its fine to have to modify the puzzle to keep ahead of attacks.
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
PGP signature