> > Oskar is right. A think cash system only stops a weak attacker. So it > > protects against script kiddies to some extent but doesn't help against > > Them. > > Yes, he is. However, stopping script kiddies isn't exactly a total loss. Yeah, I'm still all about optional think cash integration when there's a viable puzzle generator. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Mark J. Roberts
