> If a system like this became wide spread, > I would go back there and and start a company that solved these puzzles > wholesale by the thousand for people who for one reason or another wanted > them solved. Oskar is right. A think cash system only stops a weak attacker. So it protects against script kiddies to some extent but doesn't help against Them. So my conclusion on think cash is that when a hard to defeat puzzle generator is written I will be happy to add support for optional think cash to arbitrary indices and until then there's not much to talk about. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Timm Murray
