On Sat, 5 May 2001, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Someone told me that there would be no metadata permitted in 0.4 CHKs.
> If this is true then it needs to be rethought - I can imagine no reason
> why client-side metadata would not be permitted. For example, it would
> prevent web browsers from displaying documents referenced by CHKs.
>
> Is this true?
Okay, I'm the idiot who started spewing these silly ideas. The resolution
here was that:
1) CHKs too small to be split may contain DMI. They are small
anyway, so they won't clog the network.
2) SplitFiles may contain DMI in their separate metadata. The
metadata is tiny, so it won't clog the network.
Am I right?
--
"...it must be held that third-party electronic monitoring, subject
only to the self-restraint of law enforcement officials, has no place
in our society..." Mark Roberts | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
